
By Janvi Satpal Babbar
Advocate, Supreme Court of India
The Union government’s decision to reduce GST on life insurance policies from 18% to zero is more than a fiscal reform—it is a statement of values. It recognizes that human life cannot be treated as a commodity and that the State carries a constitutional duty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution—the Right to Life—to make financial protection accessible to all.
For decades, life insurance has been an essential tool of security, yet for many Indian families, affordability kept it out of reach. By removing GST, the government has signaled that safeguarding families must take precedence over taxation.
Insurance is not just a financial product; it is a shield that protects households against unforeseen loss. For millions of Indians, especially in semi-urban and rural regions, the added 18% GST made policies appear more like luxuries than necessities.
With only 3.2% of the Indian population covered under life insurance (IRDAI 2023), the gap is glaring. Eliminating the tax burden restores the true purpose of insurance—as a social safety net that protects dignity, livelihood, and future stability.
India’s insurance landscape is vast, offering products designed for varied needs:
Different in structure but united by one truth: life is priceless, and financial security is essential to human dignity.
Article 21 was once viewed narrowly as the right to mere existence. Today, courts interpret it as encompassing dignity, health, education, and security. Removing GST from insurance premiums translates this principle into practice.
Insurance is not merely a contract—it is part of the broader constitutional promise of welfare and protection, ensuring that citizens can live without fear of economic ruin in the face of personal loss.
The timing is crucial. Rising health emergencies, climate-driven risks, and economic uncertainty have shown how fragile family finances can be. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the devastating consequences of inadequate protection, leaving many families financially broken.
By making insurance tax-free, the government reframes it from being an “expense” to being a family investment in security and survival.
Advanced economies show the difference policy can make:
India, despite having one of the largest insurers in the world—LIC—lags behind. Removing GST is a step toward closing that gap and bringing insurance into the financial mainstream.
Critics may highlight lost tax revenue, but the long-term gains outweigh immediate fiscal losses. Greater insurance coverage means:
For the reform to achieve real depth, further steps are needed:
(Related Reading: India’s push for financial inclusion and the role of digital access in rural economies.)
The removal of GST on life insurance premiums is not just a financial adjustment—it is a moral, social, and constitutional affirmation. By linking tax policy to the Right to Life under Article 21, the government has recognized that every household deserves security and peace of mind.
Life is beyond taxation. In making life insurance GST-free, India has taken a decisive step toward universal protection, ensuring that the dignity of families is not left vulnerable to financial ruin. This reform strengthens not just the insurance sector, but also the very foundation of India’s democracy.